OK, I put up a proposal on #SummerOfProtocols for an #ActivityPub extension to implement end-to-end encryption of private messages.
https://forum.summerofprotocols.com/t/pig-end-to-end-encryption-in-activitypub/440
Gopher Support in Pleroma
https://pleroma.social/blog/2018/04/01/gopher/
2018-04-01T04:01:00+02:00の記事
https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-activitystreams-core-20170523/#ex27-jsonld
元ネタに倣うなら`Update`アクティビティを送信して初めて成立する投稿なのに、サーバが対応していないので中途半端になったやつ(激寒解説)
QT: https://fedibird.com/@tesaguri/112192916467061432 [参照]
CVE-2024-25623やCVE-2024-25636が健在だったらGitHubあたりに適当に怪しいオブジェクトをばら撒くことも出来たのだけど(しない)
現実的に投稿ごとに`replies`のようなコレクションのURIを記録したくないというのは理解できるけど、一方で`as:quoteUrl`や`misskey:_misskey_quote`、`fedibird:quoteUri`の乱立を踏まえてもアドホックな拡張語彙が相互運用性の観点から現実的な問題に繋がることは分かりきっているわけで。せめて間を取って<https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-5624-per-object-reply-control-policies/2723/65>くらいの形に落ち着かないものだろうか
FEP-5624: Per-object reply control policies - Standards / Fediverse Enhancement Proposals - SocialHub
https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-5624-per-object-reply-control-policies/2723/63
> Proposed alternative: Use Add/Remove targeting the replies collection. Or any other collection, like a context collection representing the conversation.
これのような方向性が綺麗だと思っているのだけど、結局こうはなっていないようなのだよなあ
引用の通知のフィルターのようなことを考えているなら良いのだけど、FEP-5624 (Per-object reply control policies)の議論の流れを見るに、どうも引用元の投稿者が引用を拒否する機能を想定しているっぽいのだよなあ(<https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-5624-per-object-reply-control-policies/2723/21>)
To answer some common questions I get:
Yes, we want to have proper safety features for Quote Posts. We got enough feedback from Xitter to know how they can be used for harassment. Maybe this is not a concert to you, but it is for us.
Yes, it takes time, but we are a very small team, with only one full-time developer for the backend. At the moment, handling the day-to-day (reviews, bug fixes, security) is already more than what we can handle.
A critical security issue has been fixed in version 20240330
. Please upgrade your Firefish server as soon as possible.
Upgrade guide: https://firefish.dev/firefish/firefish/-/blob/main/docs/upgrade.md
Changelog: https://firefish.dev/firefish/firefish/-/blob/main/docs/changelog.md
Check normalized call signature for WF in mir typeck by compiler-errors · Pull Request #118882 · rust-lang/rust
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118882
ほーん……何も分からん(?)
context: https://github.com/kitsune-soc/kitsune/pull/514
if anyone wants to help out, feel free. this is an ask to just please help out if you have an idea
この方はただの例です