大逆小言 @proletariak@fedibird.com

Due to the fact that Ricky Gervais' jokes could be just as unjustifiably offensive as those told by conservative comedians, I was hesitant to click it when I saw his face on the cover.

After all, last time I clicked to check one of alt-right entrepreneur Nishimura Hiroyuki’s recent tweets insulting antiwar activists in Japan, Twitter decided I might love to join his young and right-leaning followers, and started to torture me with notifications about his new tweets for a whole fucking month.

This time I clicked anyway...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2zIXTIyjXY

Taiwanese people:

Easily triggered when being called Chinese, but cannot care less when the distinctions between Persians/Arabs or Bamar/Lao are explained to them in plain language.

Virtually unable to put themselves in someone else's shoes. Well-mannered and self-centered at the same time.

Are they easy to get along with? Yes. Do I enjoy their company? No.

垂直面に生えるコケが好きになった。

台灣版的アーモンド効果，談不上有多好喝，但多年來不少人已經習慣這個味道了。

至於外包裝稍微醜一點嘛，算是標配吧。

https://www.ntv.co.jp/best-artist/articles/1178kfyc1vtiie3suha.html

所以說嘛，搞了半天，我想要欣賞黑色餅乾一夜限定的復活演出，終究還是得先聽完一狗票傑尼斯男團的垃圾音樂，才等得到天野南原徐若瑄上台不是嗎？這划算嗎？

https://www.edunion.org.tw/edutw/時代力量的黨內分歧，可能提早揭示了台灣政治的/

屁話講了半天，意思就是「為了不讓國民黨或民眾黨漁翁得利，在野陣營監督政府的力道須以不致動搖民進黨的長期穩固執政為限」。

亞洲國家的知識份子高論，經常都是這副沒出息的嘴臉，整天替所謂的民主預設一堆類似的不合理前提，在朝的你懶得監督，但一天到晚給在野的穿小鞋，日本如斯韓國如斯中國如斯新加坡亦如斯，台灣同樣無法倖免。

難怪貧富懸殊無解。難怪人權淪喪無盡。

其實啊，民進黨跟國民黨，除了國家認同跟國族意識相對立，絕大多數的立場跟主張都重疊，只是兩群分別守護資產階級不同陣營既得利益的孿生右翼罷了。lesser evil 誠然要比 greater evil 來得好，但請問 lesser evil 真的 good enough 嗎？標準放這麼低，真的 ok 嗎？

也正是這種舔資媚權階級盲的評論家，格外熱中於指導別人怎麼當個忠誠的在野黨；可不可以請你們另行培養其他更具公益色彩的嗜好啊？譬如打高球或打麻將之類的。拜託。

Corrupted, hypocritical and reactionary as it is, FIFA is still capable of organizing seemingly successful events, by most people's standards.

That's why I admire the athletes. Successful or not, their team effort is the only thing that's real in this one colossal lie.

YouTube Musicで様々な音楽を500曲集めて作ったプレイリストをシャッフル再生すると、ニクソン時代の反戦歌（エドウィン・スターのウォー）を聞き終わって、すぐに鎌倉時代の鎮魂曲（エバン・コールの鎌倉殿の13人）がイヤホンから流れた。

偶然な組み合わせなのに、なんとなくセンチメンタルになってしまった。

因此想到一樁間接相關的事：

上個月還是上上個月，某一集アメトーーク揭露了キャイ〜ン的兩人感情非常好，是那種上個通告剛錄完，兩人才分開沒 20 分鐘，天野就會接到鈴木打來的肉麻電話表達各種感謝跟關懷的如膠似漆程度。

都已經在演藝圈混了 30 年，這種情比金堅的程度真的太驚人了。

然後，徐若瑄重登日本小螢幕，見取り図的盛山應該很開心吧？大小姐要不要順便上個ヒルナンデス算了？反正是團長大人的地盤嘛。
QT: https://g0v.social/@zonble/109425759607755461 [参照]

話說，台灣當年的三一八衝立院，在 20140324 演變成警力蠻橫掃蕩行政院內外學生的流血鎮壓過後，抗議現場先後跑來好幾群義憤填膺的新北少年仔，平常就被條子找碴慣了，對於公權力欺負大學生看不過去，嚷著要進場幫忙，結果卻因為「江湖味」「8+9 氣息」過於濃厚，被誓言守護各大名校學生人身安全的糾察隊團團圍住，現場沒有人覺得混街頭的窮人家子弟值得信任。

結果呢？這場盡全力維持知識份子與中產階級純淨身分的社會運動，最後到底替金字塔底層最可能蒙受自由貿易衝擊的民眾，爭取到哪些戰果？「出關播種」亦不過是一句屁話罷了。

Hate to say that but, similar news coverage full of this time-to-rejoice-and-overrate-ourselves-over-insignificant-stuff-again bullshit, which overshadows what really matters, has been all the rage here in Taiwan for quite some years too. Definitely not a coincidence.
QT: https://mstdn.jp/@sssugita/109401899772894022 [参照]

講難聽一點，台灣的選舉文化，其實就是早年本島分類械鬥的代議政治化。

因此多數人的選舉參與，既不是為了「落實理念」也不是為了「改善現狀」，而是為了「打擊異己」跟「擁護我方領袖」。

也正是因為如此，才會出現「搶救」這樣的競選語言。政黨或財團呼籲大家幫忙搶救的對象，是己方的政壇頭人，是我族的既得利益，但永遠不會是人權、生態或多元價值。

少給我在那邊「選人不選黨」「選黨不選人」啦，真有本事的話，你們何不「選政見不選人 / 黨」一次，讓老子開開眼界？

Not to mention the political spectrum in question is regretfully narrow and right-leaning in the first place.

I hate municipal elections in Taiwan.

Here in Taipei, every candidate across the political spectrum claims they will speed up demolition of old apartments and construction of new ones. But they all shun the fact that, after years of out-of-hand speculative real estate transactions, rents for new housing are now 60%~200% higher than what landlords are charging for aged properties, which have already been overwhelmingly expensive.

I am slowly forced into homelessness. My vote won’t save me.